🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial European final against a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated his squad for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Over System and Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued by a man with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that United’s style to football “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Order: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for using too much that system. Hire the process guy and later bin him for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.